Coming to Terms with the World: Hannah Arendt’s Perspective for Reconciling with the 1965 Tragedy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v9i2.53692Keywords:
political reconciliation, political crimes, 1965 tragedy, the world, judgment, responsibility, Hannah ArendtAbstract
This article seeks to elaborate on Hannah Arendt’s conception of political reconciliation as a means of coming to terms with the mass killings of civilians suspected and accused of being members or sympathizers of the Indonesian Communist Party (Partai Komunis Indonesia, PKI). Known as the 1965 tragedy, this episode of massacres remains an enduring historical burden that continues to fragment and divide Indonesian society. Since the fall of Soeharto in 1998, successive Indonesian governments have attempted reconciliation processes, all of which have failed. From the perspective of transitional justice, it has been argued that these failures are often attributed to the government’s inability to rehabilitate victims’ rights and hold perpetrators accountable. Contrary to this view, I argue that the failure to come to terms with the 1965 tragedy is due not to a lack of punitive or restorative measures but rather to an excessive or disproportionate focus on individual actors – victims or perpetrators – at the expense of the common world. Drawing on the lens of Arendt’s political thought, this article proposes that reconciliation should instead center on the common world – a social reality constituted and inhabited by free and equal individuals. In this light, political reconciliation is understood as coming to terms with a world marked by a dark and painful past. Such an understanding presupposes the capacity of those dwelling within this common world – particularly victims and perpetrators – to engage in reflective judgment concerning what has occurred and to assume collective responsibility for building and sustaining a shared future. Accordingly, this article will first examine the 1965 mass killings as the dark side of the ‘Indonesian’ common world, followed by an exposition of Hannah Arendt’s proposal for coming to terms with such tragedies. The final section will outline two key elements of political reconciliation, that is reflective judgment and collective responsibility.
Downloads
References
Annie, Pohlman. “Introduction: The Massacres of 1965-1966: New Interpretation and the Current Debate in Indonesia.” Journal of Current Southeast-Asian Affairs, 32 (3).
Arendt, Hannah. Men In Dark Times. New York: A Harvest Book, Harcourt Brace & Company, 1955.
-------------. The Human Condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1958.
-------------. Between Past and Future. New York: The Viking Press, Inc.1961.
--------------. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: Penguin Group Ltd., 1963.
-------------. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Ronald Beiner (ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press,1992.
-------------, Essays in Understanding. New York: Schoken Books, 1994.
-------------, Denktagebuch. Munchen: Piper Verlag, 2002.
-------------, Responsibility and Judgment. Jerome Kohn (ed.). New York: Schocken Books, 2003.
Antaki, Mark. The Burden of Grace: Bearing Responsibility for the World. Quinnipiac Law Review 30, 2012.
Berkowitz, Roger. Bearing Logs on Our Shoulders: Reconciliation, Non-Reconciliation, and the Building of A Common world. Theory & Event 14 (1), 2011.
------------. “Reconciling Oneself with Reality, Whatever It May Be: Judgment and Worldliness in Hannah Arendt’s Politics.” Artifacts of Thinking: Reading Hannah Arendt’s Denktagebuch, Roger Berkowitz and IanStorey (eds.). New York: Fordham University Press, 2017.
Arimbi, Diah Ariani. “The 1965 Indonesian Killings Discourse by Generation 200 Writers.” Avativisme, 14 (1), 2011.
Birks, Teresa. Neglected Duty: Providing Comprehensive Reparations to the Indonesian 1965 Victims of State Persecution. International Centers for Transititional Justice, 2006.
Braüchler, Birgit. The Cultural Dimension of Peace: Decentralization and Reconciliation in Indonesia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
Cribb, Robert & Coppel, Charles A. “A Genocide that Never Was: Explaining the Myth of Anti-Chinese Massacres in Indonesia, 1965-66.” Journal of Genocide Research, 11 (4), 2009.
Firdiansyah. “Peran dan Harapan Korban untuk Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Berat HAM Masa Lalu.” Jurnal HAM, Vol. VIII, 2016.
Gready, Paul. The Era of Transitional Justice: The Aftermath of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa and Beyond. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2011.
Grey, Sam. “Returning to the Source: Revisiting Arendtian Forgiveness in the Politics of Reconciliation.” Theoria: A Journal of Social & Political Theory, 66(4), 2019.
Hartono, Yudi & Huda, Choirul. Sejarah Kontroversi G 30 S/PKI: Konstruksi Materi dan Praksis Pembelajaran. Madium; UNIPMA Press, 2020.
Hearman, Vannessa. “Between Citizenship and Human Rights: The Struggle for Justice after Indonesia’s 1965 Mass Violence.” Citizenship Studies, 22 (2), 2018.
------------. “The Uses of Memoirs and Oral History Works in Researching the 1965-1966 Political Violence in Indonesia.” IJAPS, 5 (2), 2009.
Himawan, Adhitya dan Saleh, Ummi Hadyah. “Rekonsiliasi Kasus 1965 Harus Dimulai dari Diri Sendiri.” https://www.suara.com/news, 2016.
Horsman, Yasco. Theaters of Justice: Judging, Staging, and Working Through in Arendt, Brecht, and Delbo. USA: Stanford University Press, 2010.
Keladu, Yosef. (2015). “Ethics of Worldliness: The Ethical Character of Arendt’s Political Thought.” Kritike: An Online Journal of Philosophy, 9(1), 2015.
Keller Hirsch, Alexander. “Judgment, Imagination and Critique in the Politics of Reconciliation.” International Journal of Transitional Justice. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijs030, 2013.
Lee Shinkyu. “Building Communities of Peace: Arendtian Realism and Peacebuilding.” Polity, 2022.
Levi, Shai. Crimes of Action, Crimes of Thought: Arendt on Reconciliation, Forgiveness and Judgment. In Thinking in Dark Times: Hannah Arendt on Ethics and Politics, eds. Roger Berkowitz, Jeffrey Katz, and Thomas Keenan, 229-243. New York: Fordham University Press, 2010.
McGregor, Katharine. “Exposing Impunity: Memory and Human Rights Activism in Indonesia and Argentina. Journal of Genocide Research, 19 (4), 1017.Moellendorf, Darrel. “Reconciliation as A Political Value.” Journal of Social Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2007.00375, 2017.
Melvin, Jess. “Mechanics of Mass Murder: A Case for Understanding the Indonesian Killings as Genocide.” Journal of Genocide Research, 19 (4), 2017.
Moellendorf, Darrel. “Reconciliation as a Political Value.” Journal of Social Philosophy, 38 (2), 2007.
Mrovlje, Maša. Forgiveness, Representative Judgement and Love of the World: Exploring the Political Significance of Forgiveness in the Context of Transitional Justice and Reconciliation Debates. Philosophia (United States), 44(4), 1079-1098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-016-9726-7, 2016.
Muldoon, Paul. A reconciliation most desirable: Shame, narcissism, justice and apology. International Political Science Review, 38(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512116641318, 2017.
Nurachman, Nani I.R. “Dari Memori Menjadi Narasi: Trauma Sosial dalam Sejarah Nasional.” Jurnal HAM, Vol VIII, 2016.
Polman, Annie. “Introduction: The Massacres of 1965-1966: New Interpretations and the Current Debate in Indonesia.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 32 (3), 2013.
Prior, John Mansford. “Masa Lalu tak Pernah Mati, Bahkan tak Pernah Berlalu.” Berani Berhenti Berbohong: 50 tahun Pasca-Peristiwa 1965-1966. Otto Gusti Madung & John Mansford Prior (eds.). Maumere: Penerbit Ledalero, 2015.
Purnamasari, Dian Dewi dan Susilo, Nina. “Negara Akui Pelanggaran HAM Berat.” Kompas, 12 Januari 2023.
Putri, Ganesh Cintika. “Seni untuk Damai: Upaya Rekonsiliasi Akar Rumput Pasca Tragedi 1965.” Masyarakat Indonesia: Majalah Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Indonesia, 44(2), 2018.
Rahman, Fareza. “Peran International People’s Tribunal 1965 dalam Upaya Advokasi Korban Peristiwa 1965-1966 Indonesia.” Jurnal Analisis Hubungan International, 7 (2), 2018.
Rajdab, Syamsudin. “Politik Hukum Penyelesaian Pelanggaran HAM Berat di Era Pemerintahan Jokowi-JK. Jurnal Politik Profetik, 6 (2), 2018.
Santoso, Aboeprijadi & van Klinken, Gerry. “Genocide Finally Enters Public Discourse: The International People’s Tribunal 1965.” Journal of Genocide Research, 19 (4), 2017.
Schiff, Larissa Jade. Burdens of Political Responsibility: Narrative and the Cultivation of Responsiveness. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Sulistiyanto, Priyambudi. Politics of justice and reconciliation in post-Suharto Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia. https://doi.org/10.1080/0047233060110462, 2007.
van Klinken, Gerry. “Pembunuhan di Maumere: Kewarganegaraan Pascapenjajahan.” Berani Berhenti Berbohong: 50 tahun Pasca-Peristiwa 1965-1966. Otto Gusti Madung & John Mansford Prior (eds.). Maumere: Penerbit Ledalero, 2015.
Vivian, Bradford. “On the Language of Forgetting.” Quarterly Journal of Speech, 95 (1), 2009.
Wahyuningroem, Sri Lestari, “Seducing for Truth and Justice: Civil Society Initiatives for the 1965 Mass Violence in Indonesia,” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 32 (3), 2013.
Wieringa, Saskia E. & Katjasoengkana (eds.). Propaganda and The Genocide in Indonesia: Imagined Evil. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2019.
Wejak, Justin. “The Genocide of 1965 in Flores, Indonesia, and What’s Needed for Reconciliation.” Melbourne Asia Review. https://www.melbourneasiareview.edu.au/, 2024.
Williams, Garreth. Love and responsibility: A political ethic for Hannah Arendt. Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00176, 1998.
Zembylas, Mischalinos. The emotional regimes of reconciliation in history textbook revision: reflections on the politics of resentment and the politics of empathy in post-conflict societies. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 24(3), 2016.
Zuburchen, Mary S. History Memory, and the ‘1965 Incident’ in Indonesia. California: University of California Press, 2002.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yosef Keladu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.



