Coming to Terms with the World: Hannah Arendt’s Perspective for Reconciling with the 1965 Tragedy

Yosef Keladu

doi:10.19184/jseahr.v9i2.53692

Authors

Yosef Keladu Ledalero Institute of Philosophy and Creative Technology, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v9i2.53692

Keywords:

political reconciliation, political crimes, 1965 tragedy, the world, judgment, responsibility, Hannah Arendt

Abstract

This article seeks to elaborate on Hannah Arendt’s conception of political reconciliation as a means of coming to terms with the mass killings of civilians suspected and accused of being members or sympathizers of the Indonesian Communist Party. Known as the 1965 tragedy, this episode of massacres remains an enduring historical burden that continues to fragment and divide Indonesian society. Since the fall of President Soeharto in 1998, several Indonesian governments have attempted reconciliation processes, all of which have failed. From the perspective of transitional justice, it has been argued that these failures are often attributed to the government’s inability to rehabilitate victims’ rights and hold perpetrators accountable. Contrary to this view, this research argues that the failure to come to terms with the 1965 tragedy is due not to a lack of punitive or restorative measures, but rather due to an excessive or disproportionate focus on individual actors—victims or perpetrators—at the expense of the common world. Drawing on the lens of Arendt’s political thought, this article proposes that reconciliation should instead center on the common world—a social reality constituted and inhabited by free and equal individuals. In this light, political reconciliation is understood as coming to terms with a world marked by a dark and painful past. Such an understanding presupposes the capacity of those dwelling within the common world—particularly victims and perpetrators—to engage in reflective judgment around what has occurred, and to assume collective responsibility for building and sustaining a shared future. This article will first examine the 1965 mass killings as the dark side of the Indonesian common world, followed by an exposition of Hannah Arendt’s proposal for coming to terms with such tragedies. The final section will outline two key elements of political reconciliation: reflective judgment and collective responsibility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Antaki, Mark, “The Burden of Grace: Bearing Responsibility for the World” (2012) 30 Quinnipiac Law Review.

Arendt, Hannah, Between Past and Future (New York: The Viking Press Inc., 1961).

———, Denktagebuch (Munchen: Piper Verlag, 2002).

———, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (New York: Penguin Group Ltd., 1963).

———, Essays in Understanding (New York: Schoken Books, 1994).

———, Men In Dark Times. New York: A Harvest Book (Harcourt Brace & Company, 1955).

———, Responsibility and Judgment, by Jerome Kohn (New York: Schoken Books, 2003).

———, The Human Condition (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1958).

Arimbi, Diah Ariani, “The 1965 Indonesian Killings Discourse by Generation 200 Writers” (2011) 14:1 Avativisme.

Berkowitz, Roger, “Bearing Logs on Our Shoulders: Reconciliation, Non-Reconciliation, and the Building of a Common World” (2011) 14:1 Theory & Event.

———, “Reconciling Oneself with Reality, Whatever It May Be: Judgment and Worldliness in Hannah Arendt’s Politics” in Roger Berkowitz & Ian Storey, eds, Artifacts of Thinking: Reading Hannah Arendt’s Denktagebuch (New York: Fordham University Press, 2017).

Birks, Teresa, Neglected Duty: Providing Comprehensive Reparations to the Indonesian 1965 Victims of State Persecution (International Centers for Transititional Justice, 2006).

Braüchler, Birgit, The Cultural Dimension of Peace: Decentralization and Reconciliation in Indonesia (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015).

Cribb, Robert & Charles A Coppel, “A Genocide that Never Was: Explaining the Myth of Anti-Chinese Massacres in Indonesia, 1965-66” (2009) 11:4 Journal of Genocide Research.

Firdiansyah, “Peran dan Harapan Korban untuk Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Berat HAM Masa Lalu” (2016) VIII Jurnal HAM.

Gready, Paul, The Era of Transitional Justice: The Aftermath of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa and Beyond (New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2011).

Grey, Sam, “Returning to the Source: Revisiting Arendtian Forgiveness in the Politics of Reconciliation” (2019) 66:4 Theoria: A Journal of Social & Political Theory.

Hartono, Yudi & Choirul Huda, Sejarah Kontroversi G 30 S/PKI: Konstruksi Materi dan Praksis Pembelajaran (Madiun: UNIPMA Press, 2020).

Hearman, Vannessa, “Between Citizenship and Human Rights: The Struggle for Justice after Indonesia’s 1965 Mass Violence” (2018) 22:2 Citizenship Studies.

Himawan, Adhitya & Ummi Hadyah Saleh, “Rekonsiliasi Kasus 1965 Harus Dimulai dari Diri Sendiri” (2016), online: <https://www.suara.com/news>.

Keller Hirsch, Alexander, “Judgment, Imagination and Critique in the Politics of Reconciliation” (2013) International Journal of Transitional Justice.

Klinken, Gerry van, Otto Gusti Madung & John Mansford Prior, “Pembunuhan di Maumere: Kewarganegaraan Pascapenjajahan” in Berani Berhenti Berbohong: 50 tahun Pasca-Peristiwa 1965-1966 (Maumere: Penerbit Ledalero, 2015).

KOMNAS HAM, Ringkasan Eksekutif Laporan Penyelidikan Pelanggaran HAM Berat, by KOMNAS HAM (Jakarta: KOMNASRI, 2012).

Kontras, Immoralitas Pemberian Gelar Pahlawan Nasional: Pewajaran terhadap Praktif Otoritarianisme, Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia Berat dan Korupsi di Indonesia, by Kontras (20 November 2025).

Lee, Shinkyu, “Building Communities of Peace: Arendtian Realism and Peacebuilding” (2022) 53:1 Polity.

Levi, Shai, “Crimes of Action, Crimes of Thought: Arendt on Reconciliation, Forgiveness and Judgment. In , eds. Roger Berkowitz, , and , 229-243. New York: , 2010.” in Roger Berkowitz, Jeffrey Katz & Thomas Keenan, eds, Thinking in Dark Times: Hannah Arendt on Ethics and Politics (New York: Fordham University Press) 229.

Mabille, L, “Nietsche and Arendt in Casterbridge: On the Burdon of History” (2004) 5 Phronimos.

McGregor, Katharine, “Exposing Impunity: Memory and Human Rights Activism in Indonesia and Argentina” (2017) 19:4 Journal of Social Philosophy.

Melvin, Jess, “Mechanics of Mass Murder: A Case for Understanding the Indonesian Killings as Genocide” (2017) 19:4 Journal of Genocide Research.

Moellendorf, Darrel, “Reconciliation as a Political Value” (2007) 38:2 Journal of Social Philosophy.

Mrovlje, Maša, “Forgiveness, Representative Judgement and Love of the World: Exploring the Political Significance of Forgiveness in the Context of Transitional Justice and Reconciliation Debates” (2016) 44:4 Philosophia (United States) 1079–1098.

Muldoon, Paul, “A reconciliation most desirable: Shame, narcissism, justice and apology” (2017) 38:2 International Political Science Review 213–226.

Nurachman, Nani IR, “Dari Memori Menjadi Narasi: Trauma Sosial dalam Sejarah Nasional” (2016) VIII Jurnal HAM.

Pohlman, Annie, “Introduction: The Massacres of 1965-1966: New Interpretations and the Current Debate in Indonesia” (2013) 32:3 Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs.

Prior, John Mansford, Otto Gusti Madung & John Mansford Prior, “Masa Lalu tak Pernah Mati, Bahkan tak Pernah Berlalu” in Berani Berhenti Berbohong: 50 tahun Pasca-Peristiwa 1965-1966 (Maumere: Penerbit Ledalero, 2015).

Purnamasari, Dian Dewi & Nina Susilo, “Negara Akui Pelanggaran HAM Berat ”, (12 January 2023).

Putri, Ganesh Cintika, “Seni untuk Damai: Upaya Rekonsiliasi Akar Rumput Pasca Tragedi 1965”, Masyarakat Indonesia: Majalah Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Indonesia 44:2 (2018).

Rahman, Fareza, “Peran International People’s Tribunal 1965 dalam Upaya Advokasi Korban Peristiwa 1965-1966 Indonesia” (2018) 7:2 Jurnal Analisis Hubungan International.

Rajdab, Syamsudin, “Politik Hukum Penyelesaian Pelanggaran HAM Berat di Era Pemerintahan Jokowi-JK” (2018) 6:2 Jurnal Politik Profetik.

Santoso, Aboeprijadi & Gerry van Klinken, “Genocide Finally Enters Public Discourse: The International People’s Tribunal 1965” (2017) 19:4 Journal of Genocide Research.

Schiff, Larissa Jade, Burdens of Political Responsibility: Narrative and the Cultivation of Responsiveness (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014).

Sulistiyanto, Priyambudi, “Politics of justice and reconciliation in post-Suharto Indonesia” (2007) Journal of Contemporary Asia.

Vivian, Bradford, “On the Language of Forgetting” (2009) 95:1 Quarterly Journal of Speech.

Wahyuningroem, Sri Lestari, “Seducing for Truth and Justice: Civil Society Initiatives for the 1965 Mass Violence in Indonesia” (2013) 32:3 Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs.

Wejak, Justin, “The genocide of 1965 in Flores, Indonesia, and what’s needed for reconciliation” (2024) Melbourne Asia Review, online: <https://melbourneasiareview.edu.au/the-genocide-of-1965-in-flores-indonesia-and-whats-needed-for-reconciliation/>.

Wieringa, Saskia E, Propaganda and The Genocide in Indonesia: Imagined Evil, by Katjasoengkana (New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2019).

Williams, Garreth, “Love and responsibility: A political ethic for Hannah Arendt” (1998) Political Studies.

Wirawan, Yerry, “Wijaya Herlambang. Kekerasan Budaya Pasca 1965: Bagaimana Orde Baru Melegitimasi Anti-Komunisme Melalui Sastra dan Film [Violence Culture Post 1965: Howe the New Order Legitimized Anti-Communism through Literature and Film]” (2014) 2:2 Social Transformations Journal of the Global South.

Zembylas, Mischalinos, “The emotional regimes of reconciliation in history textbook revision: reflections on the politics of resentment and the politics of empathy in post-conflict societies” (2016) 24:3 Pedagogy, Culture and Society.

Zuburchen, Mary S, History Memory, and the ‘1965 Incident’ in Indonesia (California: University of California Press, 2002).