Right to Die: A New Human Right or An Implication from Right to Liberty and Personal Security – The case of Vietnam

Authors

  • Thi Thao Nguyen Cao Graduate in International Trade Law at Ho Chi Minh City University of Law, Vietnam
  • Thi Kim Cuc Nguyen Doctoral School of Law, University of Pecs, Hungary & Ho Chi Minh City University of Law, Vietnam.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v10i1.52276

Keywords:

Right to die, liberty and security of person, personal decision-making, euthanasia, Vietnam, dignity

Abstract

The concept of the right to die, also referred to as the right to die with dignity, has long been a subject of interest among academics and human rights experts. Frequently, the right to die is considered in relation to the right to life, which is the most fundamental human right. However, due to the fact that one of the distinctive features of human rights is interdependence and interrelation, the right to die also intersects with other fundamental rights, notably the right to liberty and personal security. This article aims to assess the necessity of recognizing right to die as a new independent human right based on an examination of the intrinsic relationship between the right to die and the right to liberty and personal security. Accordingly, in the context of many changes in current socio-economic conditions, the demand for the right to die has emerged as a progressive approach to ensuring the enjoyment of basic human rights. Meanwhile, the right to liberty and personal security, along with the right to life, are the first substantive rights. Liberty and personal security are valuable not only for their own sake, but also because the deprivation of liberty and personal security has historically been the primary means of impairing the enjoyment of other rights. This article uses different approaches, like statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, as well as different research methods, like the historic method, the analytical/analytical-synthetic method, the comparative method and the polemic-critical method, to come to the conclusion that the right to die is not a separate human right in the present situation. However, it is reaffirmed that the right to die is an important human right, and its recognition should be regulated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Thi Kim Cuc Nguyen, Doctoral School of Law, University of Pecs, Hungary & Ho Chi Minh City University of Law, Vietnam.

Nguyen Thi Kim Cuc is currently a PhD candidate at the Doctoral School of Law, University of Pecs, Hungary. She also serves as a lecturer at the International Law Faculty, Ho Chi Minh City University of Law, Vietnam. Her primary research interests include public international law, human rights, and criminal procedure law. 

References

"Wij willen dat iedereen goed geholpen wordt bij een verzoek om euthanasie", online: <https://www.nvve.nl/?ref=accountgenie.nl>.
“Death with Dignity Reporting Forms and Instructions”, Oregon Health Authority, online: <https://www.oregon.gov/oha/PH/ProviderPartnerResources/EvaluationResearch/DeathwithDignityAct/Pages/pasforms.aspx>.
“End of Life Choices”, ECLOR, online: <https://eolcoregon.org/end-of-life-choices/death-with-dignity-act-dwda/>.
“What are the euthanasia rules for couples in the Netherlands?”, Dutch News (10 February 2024), online: <https://www.dutchnews.nl/2024/02/what-are-the-euthanasia-rules-for-couples-in-the-netherlands/>.
Asbjørn Eide & Gudmundur Alfredsson, eds, The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Springer Netherlands, 1999).
Chris Haring, “How Oregon’s Death with Dignity Law set a Precedent”, Death with Dignity (31 May 2024), <https://deathwithdignity.org/news/2024/05/how-or-dwd-law-set-a-precedent/>.
Cong Khanh, “Chua quy dinh quyen duoc chet vao hien pháp”, Tien Phong (22 October 2013), oline: <https://tienphong.vn/chua-quy-dinh-quyen-duoc-chet-vao-hien-phap-post652226.tpo>.
European Court of Human Rights, Guide on Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights - Right to liberty and security (2022), online: < https://ks.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr-ks/guide_art_5_eng-pdf>.Lyla M. Hernandez & Dan G. Blazer, eds, Genes, Behavior, and the Social Environment: Moving Beyond the Nature/Nurture Debate (The National Academics Press, 2001).
Gracia, D, “Comisión especial de estudio sobre la euthanasia”, (1998) 307, Diario de Sesiones del Senado.
Hua Thi Thao, “Quyen duoc chet khong kha thi o nuoc ta hien nay”, Tuoi Tre (09 July 2016), online: <https://tuoitre.vn/quyen-duoc-chet-khong-kha-thi-o-nuoc-ta-hien-nay-1134088.htm>.
Jamesa, “Utilitarianism View on Euthanasia”, Liberrimus (04 October 2016), online: <https://sites.dwrl.utexas.edu/liberrimus/2016/10/04/utilitarianism-view-on-euthanasia/>.
Joanna Dawson & Dora Robinson, “The European Convention on Human Rights and the Human Rights Act 1998”, House of Commons Library (6 February 2024), online: <https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-9958/CBP-9958.pdf>.
Judith A. C. Rietjens et al, “Two Decades of Research on Euthanasia from the Netherlands. What Have We Learnt and What Questions Remain?”, (2009) 6 (3), Journal of bioethical inquiry.
Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, Manifesto of the Communist Party (February 1848), online: <https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Manifesto.pdf>.
Lien Chau, “Bo y te de xuat dua quyen duoc chet vao luat”, Thanh nien (22 April 2015), online: <https://thanhnien.vn/bo-y-te-de-xuat-dua-quyen-duoc-chet-vao-luat-185464374.htm>.
Luc Deliensa & Gerrit van der Wala, “The euthanasia law in Belgium and the Netherlands”, (2013) 362 (9391), The Lancet.
Michael J. Sandel, Justice: What’s the right thing to do? (Macmillian, 2010).
Mitch Bogen, “Donna Hicks on Dignity and the Important Role It Plays In Our Lives”, Ikeda Center (15 August 2023), online: <https://www.ikedacenter.org/resources/donna-hicks-dignity-and-important-role-it-plays-our-lives>.
Nguyen Thi Kim Cuc & Cao Thi Thao Nguyen, “Quyen an tu” in Vu Cong Giao & La Khanh Tung, eds, Mot so van de ve nhan quyen hien dai (Social Sciences Publishing House, 2023).
Pauline S. C. Kouwenhoven et al, “Developments in euthanasia practice in the Netherlands: Balancing professional responsibility and the patient’s autonomy”, (2019) 25(1), Europe Journal of General Pratice, online: <10.1080/13814788.2018.1517154>.
Peter Allmark, “Death with dignity”, (2002) 28, Journal of Medical Ethics.
Petra Komel Gentilin (2019), Right to Life, Duty to Live? The Case of Euthanasia for Persons with Dementia [Master’s thesis, Uppsala University], online: <https://repository.gchumanrights.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/cea86dc9-2e9c-4212-98c2-2f78ee4d2b01/content>.
Phan Thuong & Kieu Oanh,“Quyen duoc chet co nen dua vao luat”, Thanh nien (24 April 2015), online: < https://thanhnien.vn/quyen-duoc-chet-co-nen-dua-vao-luat-185464626.htm>.
Public Health Division, Oregon Death with Dignity Act Report 2022 Data summary (8 March 2023), online: <https://www.oregon.gov/oha/PH/PROVIDERPARTNERRESOURCES/EVALUATIONRESEARCH/DEATHWITHDIGNITYACT/Documents/year25.pdf >.
Raphael Cohen-Almagor, “The Right to Die with Dignity: An Argument in Ethics and Law”, (2008) Health Law & Policy.
Samuel Blouin, “Suicide tourism’ and understanding the Swiss model of the right to die”, The Conversation (23 May 2018), online: <https://theconversation.com/suicide-tourism-and-understanding-the-swiss-model-of-the-right-to-die-96698>.
Sok K Lee, “East Asian Attitudes toward Death - A Search for the Ways to Help East Asian Elderly Dying in Contemporary America” (2009), 13:3, The Permanente Journal.
Stevens M.T, “The Quinlan case revisited: a history of the cultural politics of medicine and the law”, (1996) 21:2 Journal of health politics, policy and law.
Taylor E. Purvis, “Debating Death: Religion, Politics, and the Oregon Death with Dignity Act”, (2012) 85, Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.
Truong Hong Quang, “Ban ve quyen duoc chet và van de ve Luat An tu o Viet Nam”, (2009) 06, Institute of State and Law, at 58.
Viet Anh, “Quyen duoc chet chuyen gioi tinh co dua vao luat”, VnExpress (17 November 2004), online: <http://vnexpress.net/tin-tuc/thoi-su/quyen-duoc-chet-chuyen-gioi-tinh-co-dua-vao-luat-2015685.html>.
William Wolfe, “Biblical worldview: Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide”, Voices (30 September 2023), online: <https://www.christianpost.com/voices/biblical-worldview-euthanasia-and-physician-assisted-suicide.html>.
World Health Organization, Cause of Death on the Death Certificate in the line with ICD – Quick reference guide (2015), online: <https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/classification/icd/cause-of-death/causeofdeathflyer_2015.pdf?sfvrsn=9ec05f86_1#:~:text=Certification%20of%20death%20is%20one%20of%20the%20first,of%20events%20that%20have%20resulted%20in%20the%20death>.
World Health Organization, WHO Recommendations for conducting an external inspection of a body and filling in the Medical Certificate of Cause of Death (2023), online: <https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/classification/icd/cause-of-death/who-recommendations-for-conducting-an-external-inspection-of-a-body-and-filling-in-the-medical-certificate-of-cause-of-death-_vf_published.pdf?sfvrsn=edaa1998_32&download=true>.
Yuming Wang et al, “Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: A Comparative Analysis of Dutch and East Asian Cases”, (2020) The American Journal of Bioethics.

Published

2026-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles